🚚 gratis SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.7/5 from 167+ reviews
Women✓ In Stock🔥 Bestseller

Retro and elegant wedding ring set

★★★★★ 4.7 out of 5(167 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$5.32​
$8.87
Sale
✓ no-cost dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

Ring size: One Size(一个尺寸)Material: MetalMetal type: AlloyGem type: Cubic Zirconia

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy fulfillment
↩️
accessible Returns

📋 Product Description

Retro and elegant wedding ring set

  • Ring size: One Size(一个尺寸)
  • Material: Metal
  • Metal type: Alloy
  • Gem type: Cubic Zirconia

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Women products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 878533

Category: Women > JEWELRY > Wedding & Engagement

Original Price: $8.87 USD

Sale Price: $5.32 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 distribution & Returns

✓ at no charge shipment on orders over $50

Standard shipment: 3-5 business days​

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.7
★★★★★
Based on 2177 reviews

JB
Justin Baker ✓ Verified Purchase
5 months ago · Dallas, TX
★★★★★
extremely happy
To be fair, the Retro and elegant wedding ring set feels solid so no complaints.
28 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner
2 months ago · Colorado Springs, CO
★★★★★
Brilliant Retro and elegant wedding ring set
From my experience, it works fine and it works for me.
16 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson ✓ Verified Purchase
3 months ago · Cincinnati, OH
★★★★★
Absolutely cherish it
The Retro and elegant wedding ring set is fine if you’re not expecting premium quality.
9 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell ✓ Verified Purchase
6 months ago · Minneapolis, MN
★★★★★
Exceeded expectations
At first, the Retro and elegant wedding ring set works fine and it meets expectations.
49 people found this helpful
AP
Adam Parker ✓ Verified Purchase
4 months ago · San Diego, CA
★★★★★
A must-have
So far, the Retro and elegant wedding ring set is uncomplicated to use which is good enough.
48 people found this helpful